RESUMO
Introducción: La escisión completa del mesocolon con linfadenectomía D3 (CME-D3) mejora los resultados de los pacientes operados por cáncer del colon. Reconocer adecuadamente la anatomía vascular es fundamental para evitar complicaciones. Objetivo: El objetivo primario fue determinar la prevalencia de las variaciones anatómicas de la arteria mesentérica superior (AMS) y sus ramas en relación a la vena mesentérica superior (VMS). El objetivo secundario fue evaluar la asociación entre las distintas variantes anatómicas y el sexo y la etnia de lo pacientes. Diseño: Estudio de corte transversal. Material y métodos: Se incluyeron 225 pacientes con cáncer del colon derecho diagnosticados entre enero 2017 y diciembre de 2020. Dos radiólogos independientes describieron la anatomía vascular observada en las tomografías computadas. Según la relación de las ramas de la AMS con la VMS, la población fue dividida en 2 grupos y subdividida en 6 (1a-c, 2a-c). Resultados: La arteria ileocólica fue constante, transcurriendo en el 58,7% de los casos por la cara posterior de la VMS. La arteria cólica derecha, presente en el 39,6% de los pacientes, cruzó la VMS por su cara anterior en el 95,5% de los casos. La variante de subgrupo más frecuente fue la 2a seguida por la 1a (36,4 y 24%, respectivamente). No se encontró asociación entre las variantes anatómicas y el sexo u origen étnico. Conclusión: Las variaciones anatómicas de la AMS y sus ramas son frecuentes y no presentan un patrón predominante. No hubo asociación entre las mismas y el sexo u origen étnico en nuestra cohorte. El reconocimiento preoperatorio de estas variantes mediante angiotomografía resulta útil para evitar lesiones vasculares durante la CME-D3. (AU)
Background: Complete mesocolic excision with D3 lymphadenectomy (CME-D3) improves the outcomes of patients operated on for colon cancer. Proper recognition of vascular anatomy is essential to avoid complications. Aim: Primary outcome was to determine the prevalence of anatomical variations of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and its branches in relation to the superior mesenteric vein (SMV). Secondary outcome was to evaluate the association between these anatomical variations and sex and ethnicity of the patients. Design: Cross-sectional study. Material and methods: Two hundred twenty-fivepatients with right colon cancer diagnosed between January 2017 and December 2020 were included. Two independent radiologists described the vascular anatomy of computed tomography scans. The population was divided into 2 groups and subdivided into 6 groups (1a-c, 2a-c), according to the relationship of the SMA and its branches with the SMV. Results: The ileocolic artery was constant, crossing the SMV posteriorly in 58.7% of the cases. The right colic artery, present in 39.6% of the patients, crossed the SMV on its anterior aspect in 95.5% of the cases. The most frequent subgroup variant was 2a followed by 1a (36.4 and 24%, respectively). No association was found between anatomical variants and gender or ethnic origin. Conclusions: The anatomical variations of the SMA and its branches are common, with no predominant pattern. There was no association between anatomical variations and gender or ethnic origin in our cohort. Preoperative evaluation of these variations by computed tomography angi-ography is useful to avoid vascular injuries during CME-D3. (AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias do Colo/cirurgia , Colo Ascendente/anatomia & histologia , Colo Ascendente/irrigação sanguínea , Excisão de Linfonodo , Mesocolo/cirurgia , Argentina , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Estudos Transversais , Artéria Mesentérica Superior/anatomia & histologia , Distribuição por Sexo , Colectomia/métodos , Distribuição por Etnia , Variação Anatômica , Veias Mesentéricas/anatomia & histologiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Complications after ileocecal resection for Crohn's disease (CD) are frequent. The aim of this study was to analyze risk factors for postoperative complications after these procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients treated surgically for Crohn's disease limited to the ileocecal region during an 8-year period at 10 medical centers specialized in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in Latin America. Patients were allocated into 2 groups: those who presented major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo > II), the "postoperative complication" (POC) group; and those who did not, the "no postoperative complication" (NPOC) group. Preoperative characteristics and intraoperative variables were analyzed to identify possible factors for POC. RESULTS: In total, 337 patients were included, with 51 (15.13%) in the POC cohort. Smoking was more prevalent among the POC patients (31.37 vs. 17.83; P = .026), who presented more preoperative anemia (33.33 vs. 17.48%; P = .009), required more urgent care (37.25 vs. 22.38; P = .023), and had lower albumin levels. Complicated disease was associated with higher postoperative morbidity. POC patients had a longer operative time (188.77 vs. 143.86 min; P = .005), more intraoperative complications (17.65 vs. 4.55%; P < .001), and lower rates of primary anastomosis. In the multivariate analysis, both smoking and intraoperative complications were independently associated with the occurrence of major postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: This study shows that risk factors for complications after primary ileocecal resections for Crohn's disease in Latin America are similar to those reported elsewhere. Future efforts in the region should be aimed at improving these outcomes by controlling some of the identified factors.
Assuntos
Doença de Crohn , Humanos , Doença de Crohn/cirurgia , Doença de Crohn/complicações , América Latina/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Fatores de Risco , Complicações IntraoperatóriasRESUMO
Introduction: Hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery (HALS) is an alternative to straight laparoscopic approach (SL) that requires the use of a specific device to maintain the pneumoperitoneum. Our group has described an original double glove technique to replace it. Our purpose was to compare perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing HALS using this original technique vs SL. Methods: Retrospective review of a prospective database including patients who underwent elective laparoscopic colorectal resections between 2004 to 2020 at the Hospital Italiano, Argentina. Logistic regression analysis, propensity score matching, and inverse probability weighting were used to estimate adjusted treatment effects for perioperative outcomes. Results: HALS (n=458) and SL (n=1692) cases were demographically similar. HALS was associated with a shorter operative time (170.3 vs 206.9 minutes, p<0.001). Such difference was even more pronounced in obese (44.1 min), large patients (37.5 min), complex procedures (33.8 min) and surgeries carried out by non-trained surgeons (57,6 vs 31,6 minutes, p<0.001). Hand-assisted was associated with a lower conversion rate (5% vs 9.9%, p<0.001) with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.45 (95%CI 0.28-0.73). No difference in hospital stay, morbidity, and readmission rates was found. Conclusions: HALS with double-glove technique is comparable to SL in terms of postoperative outcomes keeping reduced operative time and conversion rates, especially in obese patients undergoing complex procedures.
Introducción: La cirugía colorrectal laparoscópica mano asistida (CLMA) es un abordaje alternativo a la laparoscopia directa (LD) que requiere de un dispositivo específico para mantener el neumoperitoneo. Nuestro grupo describió una técnica original de doble guante como alternativa a este dispositivo. El objetivo del presente trabajo fue analizar los resultados de esta técnica comparándola con la técnica de LD. Métodos: Se analizó una serie consecutiva de pacientes sometidos a cirugías colorrectales laparoscópicas entre 2004 y 2020 en el Hospital Italiano de Bs, As, Argentina. Se realizó un modelo de regresión múltiple de selección progresiva y apareamiento por puntaje de propensión para analizar los resultados perioperatorios. Resultados: Los casos de CLMA (n=458) y LD (n=1692) fueron demográficamente similares. CLMA se asoció a un menor tiempo operatorio (170,3 vs 206,9 minutos, p<0.001). Dicha reducción fue más marcada en obesos (44.1 min), pacientes grandes (37.5 min), cirugías complejas (33.8 min) y en procedimientos realizados por cirujanos no entrenados (57,6 vs 31,6 minutos, p<0.001). CLMA resultó tener menor índice de conversión (5% vs 9.9%, p<0.001) con una razón de probabilidades ajustada de 0,45. No se hallaron diferencias en cuanto a estadía hospitalaria, morbimortalidad y readmisión. Conclusión: CLMA con doble guante es comparable a la LD manteniendo un tiempo operatorio reducido y bajo índice de conversión, particularmente en pacientes obesos sometidos a procedimientos complejos.
Assuntos
Cirurgia Colorretal , Laparoscopia Assistida com a Mão , Argentina , Humanos , Estudos RetrospectivosAssuntos
Humanos , História do Século XIX , História do Século XX , História do Século XXI , Equipamentos Cirúrgicos/história , Cirurgia Endoscópica por Orifício Natural/história , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/tendências , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal/história , Microcirurgia Endoscópica Transanal/história , Cirurgia Colorretal/história , Cirurgia Endoscópica por Orifício Natural/métodos , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal/instrumentação , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal/métodos , Microcirurgia Endoscópica Transanal/métodosAssuntos
Humanos , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Pesquisa/estatística & dados numéricos , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal/métodos , Protectomia/métodos , Literatura de Revisão como Assunto , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Indicadores de Produção Científica , Mapeamento GeográficoAssuntos
Humanos , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Retais/terapia , Reoperação/métodos , Adenoma/cirurgia , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal/métodos , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Cirurgia Colorretal/métodos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Estadiamento de NeoplasiasAssuntos
Humanos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Proctoscopia/efeitos adversos , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal/efeitos adversos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Dor Pós-Operatória , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/classificação , Transtornos Urinários/etiologia , Incidência , Morbidade , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica , Proctoscopia/métodos , Fístula Retovaginal/etiologia , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Constrição Patológica/etiologiaAssuntos
Humanos , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal/efeitos adversos , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal/métodos , Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa/efeitos adversos , Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Carcinoma/cirurgia , Adenoma/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Estadiamento de NeoplasiasAssuntos
Humanos , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal/métodos , Microcirurgia Endoscópica Transanal/métodos , Protectomia/métodos , Neoplasias Retais/classificação , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/tendências , Resultado do Tratamento , Margens de ExcisãoAssuntos
Humanos , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Cirurgia Endoscópica por Orifício Natural/métodos , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal/métodos , Protectomia/instrumentação , Protectomia/métodos , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Resultado do Tratamento , Posicionamento do Paciente , Cirurgia Endoscópica por Orifício Natural/instrumentação , Duração da Cirurgia , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal/instrumentaçãoAssuntos
Humanos , Canal Anal/cirurgia , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal/efeitos adversos , Protectomia/efeitos adversos , Canal Anal/anatomia & histologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Dissecação/métodos , Embolia Aérea/etiologia , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal/métodos , Protectomia/métodos , Complicações IntraoperatóriasAssuntos
Humanos , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/tendências , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal/métodos , Canal Anal/cirurgia , Cirurgia Colorretal/métodos , Cirurgia Colorretal/tendências , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/instrumentaçãoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Acute calculous cholecystitis represents one of the most common complications of cholelithiasis. While laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the standard treatment in mild and moderate forms, the need for antibiotic therapy after surgery remains undefined. The aim of the randomised controlled Cholecystectomy Antibiotic Randomised Trial (CHART) is therefore to assess if there are benefits in the use of postoperative antibiotics in patients with mild or moderate acute cholecystitis in whom a laparoscopic cholecystectomy is performed. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A single-centre, double-blind, randomised trial. After screening for eligibility and informed consent, 300 patients admitted for acute calculus cholecystitis will be randomised into two groups of treatment, either receiving amoxicillin/clavulanic acid or placebo for 5 consecutive days. Postoperative evaluation will take place during the first 30â days. Postoperative infectious complications are the primary end point. Secondary end points are length of hospital stay, readmissions, need of reintervention (percutaneous or surgical reinterventions) and overall mortality. The results of this trial will provide strong evidence to either support or abandon the use of antibiotics after surgery, impacting directly in the incidence of adverse events associated with the use of antibiotics, the emergence of bacterial resistance and treatment costs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study and informed consent sheets have been approved by the Research Projects Evaluating Committee (CEPI) of Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires (protocol N° 2111). RESULTS: The results of the trial will be reported in a peer-reviewed publication. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02057679.